this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2025
178 points (97.3% liked)

politics

31051 readers
2013 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She took issue with the White House rescinding Elise Stefanik’s nomination for United Nations ambassador in favor of Mike Walz of Signalgate fame. In March, The Atlantic revealed that Waltz had added its editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, to a Signal chat in which top administration officials discussed plans to bomb Yemen.

“How does he get awarded after Signalgate?” Greene said. “I think there’s other women in our party that are really sick and tired of the way men treat Republican women,” Greene added. “I think there’s other women, Republican women, and I’m just giving my opinion here, who are really sick and tired of them.”

Greene also has issues with how the GOP “has turned its back on America First and the workers and just regular Americans.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

'I never thought leopards would reap MY face,' sobs woman who sowed for the Leopards Reaping People's Faces Party.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm sure this was entirely satirical, but just in case: you reap what you sow. As in, "this is what you planted and how you let it grow, now you gotta clean it from your fields."

Sowing is the act of scattering/planting your seeds in the field. Reaping is where you take your sickle (the gardening tool carried by the grim reaper), and actively cut/clear/harvest your fields. When you go to harvest, you want to harvest a lot, but not so much that you're wasting food; you want your produce easily accessible, but not too sparse; and you want to be sure that you're actually going to grow the crops that you want to harvest.

If you're growing corn, you want to be able to walk through your field and to be able to harvest systematically, so you'll likely want to plant the corn just densely enough to grow in rows so that you can walk/work your way through them. If you haphazardly plant your corn, you'll find some stalks didn't grow properly due to overcrowding, you can get lost in thick forests of corn, and your harvest will be tedious and dangerous as you trip over slashed stalks.

Also, if you're interested in a bunch of pumpkin soup, so you grab random seeds and throw them around, and then blindly water them, you don't get to be surprised when you find a bunch of rotting tomatoes that you should have harvested sooner.

Or, if you're lazy and decide to throw your seed everywhere, you'll usually find that very little grew, or if you sow a small crop because you got tired, you're going to reap a small crop.

Finally, if you're like MTJ and were warned multiple times not to sow your wheat next to the poison ivy, but you decide that poison ivy doesn't deserve its bad rap; you don't get to act surprised when your legs itch and lose skin after you've reaped your wheat, and you don't get to act indignant when no one wants to buy grain from the person who grows things among the poison ivy.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago

More like: You’re MTG and everyone tells you that poison ivy is not food and if you grow it and eat it you’re going to have a bad time. You plant it anyways and are shocked when the poison ivy you grew makes you sick and itchy when you eat it. You then proceed go complain that you were sold bad poison ivy seeds