this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
163 points (99.4% liked)

Historical Artifacts

1434 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyartifacts@piefed.social

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is that historically accurate or just a legend?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's some dispute over it. The 'tying brands to birds' trick is noted as a strategy by a handful of other historical figures noted for their ruthlessness - it's not entirely clear whether it's just terror propaganda or an actual technique that was used.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I just don't see how that would work in practice. But then, I've never besieged a city, so what do I know.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I mean, the panicked animals returning to their usual haunts seems plausible. The intention of setting the place on fire is to spread chaos internally before/during a traditional assault on the walls. Generally there's an element of deception and bad faith in the stories, that the animals were requested as tribute for peace and then immediately deployed as a weapon of war.