this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
41 points (95.6% liked)
Tech
1645 readers
7 users here now
A community for high quality news and discussion around technological advancements and changes
Things that fit:
- New tech releases
- Major tech changes
- Major milestones for tech
- Major tech news such as data breaches, discontinuation
Things that don't fit
- Minor app updates
- Government legislation
- Company news
- Opinion pieces
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Same place they get their first shot now. It's not like there is a pipeline from cheap Argentinian movies to big Hollywood movies. VFX, like game development, is a fairly global, buy-in-bulk thing where artists are put in a big warehouse and sell their work to productions worldwide. You buy VFX by the frame and it's a pretty harsh race to the bottom.
You're actually right that it's not AI, outsourcing these things is pretty straightforward cost/quality/time optimization nonsense. If an Argentinian TV show could afford a VFX shot by having it look a bit worse using tools that are a bit cheaper then the needle hasn't really moved much in any direction. They still had to hire some guy to still use some tools to still make some frames of VFX. The alternative wasn't a cheaper VFX artist, it was probably no VFX shot. And if it was a cheaper shot that's probably just one made by the same people in less time that looks much worse and makes you less close to the results that same VFX house gives someone else.
People are treating this issue overly simplistically on the Internet (what else is new) and just going "AI bad", but there's a big range of applications, implementations and interactions with different results and implications. I suppose that's why it's such an effective "being mad online" thing. People can posture maximalist outrage but the overall arc of the thing is that almost everybody does have some way or reason to use the thing effectively and many of those will misjudge what that is and use the thing poorly or get a bad result, thus creating a reason for the thing to continue to exist and for examples of the thing being misused or backfiring to keep feeding the outrage furnace.
It's not even AI and it's not even capitalism. It's public opinion in the age of social media.
Still, they made an Etheranut adaptation with Ricardo Darín and I didn't know it was out. I guess they at least Streisanded this into me becoming aware of it. The fact I didn't know already is a painful reminder that we've lost the ability to share a mainstream means of communication beyond the algorithmic social media firehose, but at least the firehose's less palatable side sprayed me with some information I can use by accident.
For the record I went and watched the first episode. It's well shot, a bit slow and not partiularly expensive. 80% of the runtime is a handful of character actors talking in a basement. This is bookeneded by a couple of VFX shots. One is simple and works alright, the other one is harder and looks pretty bad.
I'm still not mad.