this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
36 points (97.4% liked)

Slop.

582 readers
432 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

It isn’t Hamas’s fault that the settlers terrorised hundreds of thousands of Palestinians into a small pocket of land back in 1948, nor can Hamas be blamed for Gaza’s seizure in 1967, nor can Hamas be blamed for the apartheid régime having control over Gaza’s electricity and all of the other resources that can’t get in. Like I said two years ago: if the IOF merely wanted to get rid of Hamas, they could have done it less violently.

Interestingly, Herzlians never pause to ask theirselves why Hamas exists in the first place. The implication is that it simply materialized out of nothingness and to even so much as hint that the apartheid régime had anything to do with its early success or survival makes you an antisemite and possibly even worse than every Axis official and Axis collaborator combined.

By camouflaging among civilians—placing weapons, tunnels, and command posts in and under hospitals, schools, mosques, and apartment buildings—Hamas has committed an act of dehumanicide.

Oh look, it’s this trope again. Yawn.

This article is so generic that a computer programme could have churned it out. It comes with flagrant disregard for international institutions:

the highly politicized International Criminal Court is a total sham.

Dubious claims:

I'm sometimes asked what I think of Israel's "genocide." I reply by asking them what "genocide" means. Their typical reply to me? A blank look.

Sheer boneheadedness:

Israel is not trying to wipe a people off the Earth, and the evidence for that fact is all around—from Israeli troops' presence on the ground in Gaza (why would that be if they were trying to wipe Palestinians out?), to Israel's conduct in Judea and Samaria (where there is no active war against the Palestinians, much less something more dramatic)

And, of course, war crime denial:

The real tragedy is not an imaginary genocide by Israel, but the systematic dehumanization of Palestinians by their own supposed leaders.

Systematic dehumanization of Palestinians by their own supposed leaders? Yeah, Netanyahu and his cronies are systematically dehumanising the Palestinians. We know that already!

Finally, the seal of quality:

Jason D. Greenblatt was President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy between 2017 and 2019.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I can't imagine why a people who have had their land stolen by an accord they had no say in, then had more of it slowly stolen over a period of decades while the world largely just looks on and does nothing would feel that their only chance at self preservation is violence

Especially when it is well documented that the 'nation' committing the theft treats them as second class citizens at best and animals at worst, all the while demonizing even the most minuscule of protestations