this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
1541 points (99.2% liked)

Luigi Mangione

2498 readers
2 users here now

A community to post anything related to Luigi Mangione.

This is not a pro-murder community. Please respect Lemmy.world ToS.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So, in the second example, I realise those people didn't get the death penalty, but were they also eligible for it?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 42 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The line seems to be drawn at choosing whether to charge the murder at a state or federal level. In Luigi's case, he is being tried federally.

Which asks the question as to why Luigi's case is being tried federally while mass casualty/terrorism crimes are only being charged at the state level.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because he crossed state lines to escape I guess?

[–] kayohtie@pawb.social 9 points 2 months ago

It's an excuse given that is a piss poor reasoning overall.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think texas has a death penalty for capital murder, which begins at two or more murders done at the same time. That means the el paso shooter could have gotten it. Xorollo pointed out the florida possibility.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

So, they're comparing someone who could have gotten the death penalty but didn't, to someone who could get the death penalty but likely won't?