Bonus context
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
54 points (96.6% liked)
Slop.
604 readers
366 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Oof. I am used to seeing people not think too badly of Bush because it is common to not be informed about him. Thinking that he is a hapless unwitting puppet controlled by a nebulous Greater Power(TM) after being shown he is an irredeemable piece of shit is a total smooth brain move.
As the head of the CIA he was probably totally controlled by the Deep State™
Well... if we're being generous I didn't really go through the list of things he did. I kinda figured "CEO of CIA" would cut it. Their argument doesn't really suffer from having more examples thrown at it because he's always "part of a larger system." I would have to have a whole abstract argument about ethics and participation.
My bad. I assumed there was some prior context because you just mentioned an episode about Bush and that prompted the other person to put their knight armour on.