this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
701 points (97.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

8633 readers
3074 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So you would say that when referencing a singular specific person of undeterminate gender in the third person we should use is? Because I am quite sure that, if that has ever been correct at all, it certainly isn't now. As per merriam webster: A student was found with a knife and a BB gun in their backpack Monday, district spokeswoman Renee Murphy confirmed. The student, whose name has not been released, will be disciplined according to district policies, Murphy said. They also face charges from outside law enforcement, she said.— Olivia Krauth

E: also, "Each member [of the women's touch football team] found something they could improve on in the future."

Dalby (Queensland) Herald (Nexis) 21 October 16, 2014 (as quoted in the oxford english dictionary)

Contradicts you as well unless you'd like to argue that "each man are fighting for himself" is correct.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you used any other pronoun other than "they" it would be is and faces

The student also faces charges. S/He faces charges. They face charges. - this is only because we're conditioned based on they being plural.

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah? The pronoun is what causes it to be plural. This is how the grammar works. I don't understand what your argument is here.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

That's clear you don't.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The number of people you're talking about causes it to be plural, not the misuse of a plural pronoun.

[–] jackr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~Which is why we use plural for singular second person, obviously~~

E: I am not gonna continue this prescriptivist argument any further. There are certainly cases where "they is" is correct, but that does not discount the singular "they are". This is my stance and remains my stance. You believe whatever you want, have a nice day.