Slop.

609 readers

497 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme

founded 9 months ago

MODERATORS

Lyudmila@hexbear.net

VILenin@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

Hestia@hexbear.net

155

Wouldn't you all hate having the means of production? (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by cerealkiller@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Video

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

Call me old fashioned but it’s probably deteriorating material conditions that are going to radicalise more people in the long run.

Definitely true, however you're going to want a portion of the population "pre-heated" by these electoral defeats so they can do some vanguardism when the time is right. This is true even if it is stagnant and cyclical, like you propose. I don't think I fully agree myself, but I could see it.

The true revolutionary action will happen at the periphery of the empire. If some Demsocs create internal strife and discontentment in the core, it allows for more opportunities for our comrades on the ground in the more materially impoverished areas to make some moves.