this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
161 points (96.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

12430 readers
1615 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nesc@lemmy.cafe 39 points 1 week ago (21 children)

Were there any advantages over normal trains except cool factor?

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (6 children)

https://youtu.be/3APay0wgYt0

Speed, at the cost of an incompatible and more expensive infrastructure, and even "regular" raillines are now can be upgraded to 300km/h.

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

even "regular" raillines are now can be upgraded

I assume this is contingent on the existing line being fairly straight and direct? Where I live, the tracks are very meandering to navigate hills and valleys, and train staff told me the chance of an upgrade was basically zero.

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's possible to upgrade a line like that, but it will involve a lot of cutting through hills or building bridges over valleys

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't that fundamentally just making a new line?

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

It could take the same route, just flattening out the hills and valleys.

If there are sharp corners that might not work, but even lower speed rail doesn't really like sharp corners. They can be mitigated up to a certain point with banked curves.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)