this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
85 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
773 readers
403 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Can someone give me a non western chauvinist reason for why the pope isn't a dictator but the supreme leader of Iran is.
The use of the term dictator has a carve out specifically for hereditary monarchy specifically to avoid calling out European monarchs.
The pope sorta used to be like a king of the papal states and had significant political, legal, commercial and economic influence for 100s of years. However, this was all based on the existence of a world where the Italian states and Spanish and other Catholic states had dominance in europe.
With the rise of British power, the basis of the pope's power largely vanished beyond the soft power and legal loophole abilities he provided.
At least that's what I know from my very limited knowledge of Christian history.
Iran is a country, the church isn't
The Vatican is a state.
Well the Vatican doesn't count because... Uh... Uhm... It isn't a country, not a real country.
Honestly ill take that. The Vatican shouldn't be afforded the respect of statehood.