this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
120 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

72375 readers
3053 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
120
Perovskite-based image sensors promise higher sensitivity and resolution than silicon (techxplore.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

They use stacked transparent color sensors, like Foveon camera sensors used to.

In numerous experiments, the researchers put the two prototypes, which differ in their readout technology, through their paces. Their results prove the advantages of perovskite: the sensors are more sensitive to light, more precise in color reproduction and can offer a significantly higher resolution than conventional silicon technology.

The fact that each pixel captures all the light also eliminates some of the artifacts of digital photography, such as demosaicing and the moiré effect.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (21 children)

I used to work on hybrid perovskite for solar cells, during my PhD, a few years ago. The problem with theses materials was their short lifetime (some thousands of hours of sun exposition) and chemical instability, which made them unsuitable for "real life" uses, back then (but suitable to get high impact-factor papers...). Is that still a problem?

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Isn't thousands of hours enough for many cameras?

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

If it's a moving mirror camera* and it's used to take stills it's probably fine, as the sensor is only exposed for a fraction of a second per image.
If you want to film with it or put it in a phone, where it's exposed all the time, it would certainly not be enough.

* I have no clue what they are called in english

[–] Exec@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If it's a moving mirror camera* and it's used to take stills it's probably fine, as the sensor is only exposed for a fraction of a second per image.

You can say goodbye to live view then

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, the mirror reflects to the view finder untill you press the shutter, then it moves thr mirror to expose the photo sensor and then back.

[–] Exec@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago

I mean no more live view via the screen

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)