this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
81 points (95.5% liked)
Anarchism
2603 readers
26 users here now
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
Other anarchist comms
- !anarchism@slrpnk.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- !anarchism@hexbear.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.ml
- !anarchism101@lemmy.ca
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
But there would still be a genocide going on with your tacit support, so if you can enjoy brunch while your tax dollars are murdering children then I guess we just have different standards.
Although it's not said explicitly, the article uses the "we'd be at brunch" sign as an example of rhetoric that uses the liberal "No Kings" framing. The writers of the article would disagree with the message of this sign, as would any anarchist worth taking seriously, because it argues that changing the figurehead (to Kamala Harris) would be a solution, instead of abolishing the figurehead at all.
I agree with that, but the sign particularly offended me and I felt like it needed to be called out on its own merits.