this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

Linguistics

1265 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laypeople to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

  1. Instance rules apply.
  2. Be reasonable, constructive, and conductive to discussion.
  3. Stay on-topic, specially for more divisive subjects. And avoid unnecessary mentioning topics and individuals prone to derail the discussion.
  4. Post sources when reasonable to do so. And when sharing links to paywalled content, provide either a short summary of the content or a freely accessible archive link.
  5. Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
  6. Have fun!

Related communities:

Resources:

Grammar Watch - contains descriptions of the grammars of multiple languages, from the whole world.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For further info, if anyone is interested, Stephen Bax claimed a decade ago to partially decode the manuscript; here's a video with his reasoning, as well as the paper he released. Sadly Bax passed away in 2017 (may he rest in peace), so the work was left incomplete.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Some believe the book is a medieval medical encyclopedia, while others argue it's an elaborate hoax, carefully crafted to impress or deceive wealthy collectors of the time.

It's obviously a hoax if it's received the amount of attention the article suggests and no one can identify a language.