this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
155 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

71633 readers
3732 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captainastronaut@seattlelunarsociety.org 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

With a functioning federal government I would agree with you. But unfortunately they have an open checkbook right now, with no accountability or critical oversight.

[–] cole 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I hate to be this guy, but this is just... not true. That's not how this works at all. How is the government giving SpaceX money outside of a contract? They aren't.

Everyone wants to find a reason to hate SpaceX because Musk, but the truth is SpaceX is a well-ran innovative company.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

Besides the federal government trying to strong arm governments into purchasing star link?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/05/07/elon-musk-starlink-trump-tariffs/

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

SpaceX is a well-ran innovative company

their rocket just blew up

[–] cole 5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

This is not evidence to the contrary, especially when the company is intentionally trying to find the limits on a development article.

Falcon 9 (the only rocket they actually sell launches on) is one of the most reliable launch vehicles in the world.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I mean you’re right in a sense, but usually when I iterate on a design it gets better not worse.

[–] cole 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's not fair to say that iteration doesn't ever include any steps back. Development isn't always straightforward and it doesn't always go perfectly.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Well, I did say usually. Regressions happen. I’m just being sarcastic because I don’t like Nazi-owned enterprises. /me shrugs

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

This is not evidence to the contrary

besides the whole rocket blowing up thing?

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 9 hours ago

It's a good thing those cars had working doors

[–] cole 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

repeating the same thing does not make your point stronger

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

Their unmanned test rocket just blew up. Boo hoo