this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
21 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

676 readers
1 users here now

Downvote are limited to members of this community

Welcome!

Can you imagine, years ago how the internet was before? We know Facebook, Twitter, Tiktok, Youtube. We knew blogger, Tumblr, Skyrock... and long before, it was the forum era as phpBB..and mail-lists.

And now with ActivityPub, we are reshaping the web, and achieving much with lots of freedom. So thank you all, and welcome ๐ŸคŸ๐Ÿ˜

Our thread

Resources

Related communities

If you want to donate, double check on the official website and report any problem to mod team

Social network

Threadiverse

Blog

Microblog

Event

Mediaverse

Audio

Streaming/live

Book

Culture review

Picture

Short-video

Video


Image Credits :
Avatar : Wikipedia Eukombos
Banner : David Revoy licence : CC-BY-4.0

Rules

Moderation process
We all make mistakes,

If your comment is reported, and brings up a complex issue, we will reach out to you and ask you to rephrase it.

Our goal, is to create a serene space for discussion. Nothing more.

If the post isn't edited to remove hurtful language element, we will have to remove it. It would be a shame because your comment was interesting and you took some time to write it.

In case of xenophobia, racism, transphobia, homophobia or harassment, it will be a permanent ban.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
21
Voting in the threadiverse (en.m.wikipedia.org)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Snoopy@jlai.lu to c/fediverse@piefed.social
 

Hi,

i want to explore the various way we can highlight content.

Currently, on the threadiverse, we use vote to show our approval, discontent...and we can couple it with a bot for moderation. Or hide post below a certain score...

Some instance completly removed downvote as Beehaw. Piefed is experimenting private vote. On other fediverse software, mastodon, iceshrimp, there is no downvote and we use emojis to express our feelings.

You also have website as https://slashdot.org/ where you can tell that comment was insightfull or a troll, or funny...

There is also also website that compare software or video as https://tournesol.app/


  • Do you think vote sould be private ? Public ? And why ?
  • Are you sastified with the current voting system ? And why ?
  • What other interesting software/website that tried something different do you know ?
  • What way do you imagine to highlight content and improve search, discoverability ?
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] u@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think vote should be private by default, public by choice. Because I thought my votes were private to users at first.

I'm somewhat satisfied with the current system, it's a bit linear but still efficient.

I like how steam reviews added a [funny], [yes], [no] votes.

I imagine an optional vote feature after an upvote. So the user could say why they liked it by using [useful], [funny] or [relatable]. I know it won't match every posts or comments. Then use those three categories to optionally filter posts/comments (e.g. filter by most useful comments).