this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
173 points (93.5% liked)

World News

47511 readers
2340 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 39 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

When was Iran tolerable? They're still as much of a fucked up theocracy with a terrible record on human rights as they've been since the revolution.

[–] Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago

I recall seeing a lot of posts on here praising the leadership whenever they said anything negative about Trump

But that's about the only stuff positive about Iran I've seen on here.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I said tolerable to the media. Been barely discussed in UK media until Israel attacked them, now they're scrambling to justify it based on how bad Iran is...

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not in the UK, but I recall Iran being in the media a lot in China and the US. Back when Trump assassinated one of their generals during his first term, the recurring abductions and rapes of women and young girls by the morality police that sparked nationwide protests, the arms they are providing for Russia in their invasion of Ukraine, and now Israel's unprovoked attack on Iranian infrastructure and citizens.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

What do you expect iran to do want the whole west is imposing severe sanctions harming regular citizens. Iran as no choice but to work with russia. Iran could have been an neutral country if americans, israelis and britosh didn't support the shah coup

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I expect them to stop harming their own civilians, too.

We don't need to cheer on an oppressive, totalitarian regime just because they're at odds with another oppressive, totalitarian regime.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world -1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I am cheering iran right to self defence not the regime harming their own civilians.

Do you condemn israel starting the war and killing civilians ?

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yes I condemn Israel, this isn't an either/or type of situation. Both countries are shitty.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 0 points 12 hours ago

We saw how western and Israel intervention always has devastating effect to the population of those countries. The only rational way to think about this is Iran has to defend itself against foreign power known for indiscriminate destructions . Once once it is repealed . The Iranian population can fight against the regime

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works -1 points 15 hours ago

Basically nothing for 2 years (the protests ended), and the first term for Trump ended in 2021, so 4 years ago. The only thing I have seen is about arms sales, occasionally and it doesn't express any opinion other than an Iran drone was used.

In the last few days since the attack, it's quite a lot about nuclear weapons that may be 2 months, 2 years or a 20 years away, and now about journalists. Basically, the strategy has changed to bumping them up the enemies list to justify the attacks.

We don't see much about the Syrian leader, as he's not much of a terrorist now he's working with the West.

It's interesting how media can pivot their narratives about who the heroes and villains are at any time, and it's always in line with government foreign policy.

[–] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world -5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Welp, you convinced me, I now support killing as many Iranians, men women and children, as it takes to save Iranians from the yoke of the Islamic Republic. /s

Waging war on Iran will not improve the situation of any Iranian, even the worst off. Do not use the name of the people who will be slaughtered by the millions for your warmongering propaganda.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure how you got any of that from what I was saying. Feel free to take your black and white worldview somewhere else.

[–] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world -3 points 19 hours ago

Oh, I just assumed that your parroting of the mainstream media justifications of this war of aggression to be an assent of this war. Sorry, my bad.