this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
275 points (92.6% liked)
Europe
4749 readers
103 users here now
Europe
Rules:
- All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
- Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
- No personal attacks
- Posts in English, translations allowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
To be fair Iran would use their nuke on Israel and everyone knows it.
Would they, though? Knowing that the entire rest of the world would be down their throats in an instant? Knowing Israel would immediately nuke them back?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Israel_relations#Iran_threatening_Israel
If you read more of the list of threat, it is highly probable.
So?
It make sense to go to war against someone who is building a device to instantly destroy you.
It makes sense to build that device as a deterrent against Us-Israeli aggression...not that there was any proof of it anyway. Besides, trump destroyed the deal we had to prevent Iranian nukes so now Iran MUST arm itself. He's an absolute fucking moron.
Iran was already arming itself.
Else why did they had undeclared nuclear facilities ?
Why are you defending Iran, is it too hard for you to have 2 evil governement attacking each other, one of them must be a good guy ?
If you saw how Israel was acting and that the US was a fucking warmongering psychopath lead by an absolute fucking clown in 2016 what would YOU do?
Nothing, I'm just a civilian not living in any of the country you cited.
Still and unprovoked war started by Israel and the US so yes, there is definitely a good guy and a bad guy in this particular scenario.
It isn't unprovoked, Iran officials clearly expressed multiple time the will to annihilate Israel, and funded terrorist targeting them.
How is that not provocation.
SO YOU AGREE that the US should be nuked because of CIA actions in central and south America in the 50s-80s
You really are insane, I never said any country should be nuked.
You are the one saying a country should let themselves be nuked.
It's amazing that you keep arguing unrelated pedantic tangents and cant grasp the analogy
"Pedantic tangents" when the other party is proposing nuking countries.