this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
249 points (97.3% liked)

United Kingdom

4903 readers
463 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You do realise that the whole point of the United Nations is so that things like that this don’t happen anymore.

No? The point of the UN is to stop actual wars, not what the UK is trying to describe as war, which are things that the west has been consistently doing for the entire lifetime of the UN.

So how can we not be at war with an entity so fundamentally untrustworthy.

Because a lot of countries are fundamentally untrustworthy? Including all of the ones who are signed onto the Rome Statute who are still supporting Israel. Which includes the UK. If you really want to redefine terms so that any untrustworthy country is inherently at war, then the UK is at war with the entire world.

You are complaining that the West is at war with Russia

No, I'm pointing out that the West isn't at war with Russia, and it's an Orwellian abuse of language to say they are.

that’s because Russia is constantly breaking the rules

There is no rule that Russia has broken that the west, especially the UK, hasn't repeatedly and flagrantly violated both in the past and currently.

Your problem is that you’ve already decided who is right and who is wrong and you’re not going to allow anything like reality to get in the way of that.

Wrong. Nothing I have said implies that; I'm guessing this is a go to straw-man you go to, but it most certainly doesn't apply to me. If anything, it sounds like you're projecting; you've already decided whos wrong and that's why you're not actually reading or responding to what I'm saying.