this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
119 points (99.2% liked)
Programming Circlejerk
227 readers
1 users here now
Community to talk about enlightened programming takes
Rules:
- read and follow the programming.dev code of conduct
- no flamewars
- mark your unjerks
- only programming related content allowed
- link to the original source
- do not mention this community in places like hackernews, lobste.rs, or the general programming communities on Lemmy where we source jerk material from.
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I still don't understand why we're using humans to review AI code. Shouldn't AIs be reviewing the code?
We're letting AIs do the fun part (coding) and forcing humans to review (the worst part) reams more janky code.
AI's get the fun part of everything right now. AI gets writing, humans get editing. AIs get drawing, humans get fixing hands and details, etc etc
AI's aren't smart enough yet. But plenty of people are also using them to review code.
What are the results if you take code written by one brand of ai and then have another brand of ai review it? Like use chatgpt to write code, and then ask copilot if the generated code has any errors and will work as intended?
I don't know, if I put my hand in a fan and then put that mutilated hand into another brand of fan, do you think that might fix it?
Interesting idea, I've never tried that. I feel like it wouldn't be a silver bullet but you might get slightly better results I guess.