this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
156 points (77.3% liked)

childfree

2277 readers
374 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source for the 7% statistic

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Then again, is breast cancer here counted as female or non gender specific?

They really do make it sound as if 93% goes to male only research, but I highly doubt that's he case

[โ€“] Gustephan@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I'm a casual observer, so take this as the understanding of some dumbass on lemmy rather than anybody who's actually been in the medical field. My understanding is that the majority of "non-gendered" medical research done through history has actually been male only, given discrimination and women being hidden inside the home for a lot of history. I've also heard that young male cadavers were WAY more available in like industrial revolution england than young female cadavers (affecting both medical research and training) just given who was more likely to get a dangerous job and die young. I know modern medicine understands how to sample a population a bit better than that, but the absolute vast majority of medical research still happened in places/eras that considered women property.