this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
175 points (77.1% liked)

childfree

2443 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source for the 7% statistic

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kevlar21@lemm.ee 47 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

I don’t doubt that women are underrepresented in medical research, but at the same time I suspect most medical research targets issues that affect both men and women, since that is true of most medical issues. The 7% statistic would be more impactful if we could compare it to the percentage of medical research focused on medical issues specific to men.

Edit: after further consideration, my initial take here isn’t great either, because women face more medical issues specific to their gender. I still think the 7% statistic is a little misleading.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago

Yep, that 7% doesn't mean the rest is going to research on men specific health, it means that 7% is for women health, an unknown % is for men health and the rest is for human health in general (which is logically the biggest %).

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Issues that affect both women and men still often tend to affect both in different ways -- but the majority of medical research tends to just take what works for the standard male body and apply that to everyone regardless of sex instead of investigating sex-specific effects and tailoring solutions around that

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

"In 2020, only 1% of funding for healthcare research and innovation (beyond oncology) was invested in women's health."