this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
111 points (97.4% liked)

Linux

7412 readers
213 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

That's all. I just found this in a random script. Generates a random UUID every time it's called. I didn't know.

Of course I can also use uuidgen or pipe /dev/(u)random into something to get a random alphanumeric string - but this is built right into the kernel!

In /proc/sys/kernel/random/, there's also boot_id which ~~seems to do the same~~ is static, and some tweakable parameters.

❤️🐧

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

See also: /dev/null

It’s basically a black hole where you can throw anything.

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but what if it were a subscription? May I present: /dev/null-as-a-Service.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 8 hours ago

The most secure Bitcoin endpoint yet!

lol.

Okay, let’s be honest, it’s basically a crappy Pentium 4 box with Debian and nginx installed.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (5 children)
cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > /dev/null
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

while :; do cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > /dev/null; done

edit: on all cores for maximum "efficiency"

[–] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Would have to be cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid > /dev/null

You can't pipe to a file, only to programs, and since /dev/null isn't an executable your command will simply give an error.

To make it more clear, consider using dd, which lets you explicitly specify an input and output file. For example: dd if=/proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid of=/dev/sda1 wait shit that wasn't the right output oh god oh fu

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

dd is just cp but more confusing here.
The only thing dd can do that cp can't is stop ahead of time, which only really matters for infinite files like /dev/random

cp /proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid /dev/sda

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago

dd if=/proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid of=/dev/sda1

Peanuts. Real men do dd if=/proc/sys/kernel/random/uuid of=/dev/sda

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Thanks, I'm overworked lately.

lol, the last part

[–] sixtoe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

i saw this and came to do THE THING but you beat me too it. GOOD ANYA

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The information will be evenly distributed upon its surface and some believe one day it will be be radiated back out into the rest of the system.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

That's a horrifying concept. Better not think about it.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That reminds me of the CPU stress test I ran many years ago.

dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/null

If you have 8 cores, just open 8 terminals, and run that code in each of them.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Can you guarantee that each process will run on its own core?

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago

Absolutely not, quite the opposite actually. However, the end result is close to 100% CPU load, which is good enough for some purposes. Let’s say you want to test the performance of your CPU cooler, or overclock stability, this should good enough. There are also dedicated tools for people with more advanced needs.

[–] YerbaYerba@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

/dev/urandom should stress the CPU more. /dev/random can be entropy limited

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
for i in {1..n}  # where n == number of cores
do
  dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null &
done

# to stop:
jobs -p | xargs kill
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yeah. This looks like a much better way to do it. My solution is pretty bare bones by comparison.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 14 hours ago

the advantage of yours is that you can actually see the performance number afterwards.