this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
112 points (82.9% liked)

Uplifting News

15158 readers
44 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you can't even bother to search there is no help for you. I don't make up search results.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I really don't feel the need to read the lore wiki for your fan fiction. Particularly because I know first hand you make these kinds of accusations baselessly

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I rest my case, can't even be bothered to do a simple search after being caught or maybe he actually did do a search and now trying to weasel his way out.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You rest your case of "you go find me evidence for me!"?

You'd make a terrible lawyer.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Please don't search for me, search for yourself. Obviously, you did it and didn't like what you saw.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah, I already know you lie about these kind of things from first hand experience, so I also know you're just trying to waste my time by making me provide the evidence for your accusation.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, you have made it clear you prefer to waste time replying for hours instead of search.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, you have made it clear you prefer to waste time replying for hours instead of search.

Very close you almost got it. Good job! I said "you prefer to waste time" not "wasting time". Try looking for the "search" button not "searching" button, it looks like a magnifying glass, mouse over it and wait for tooltip it will say "search". So proud of you, the time I wasted on you has paid off. You are welcome.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, sarcasm didn't work the first dozen times you try it, but maybe if you keep trying it will?

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Most of them didn’t work the first time,

Yup, You were right to say some worked the first time. The rest took more time. Are you saying you are lying?

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The result speaks for themselves including your earlier admission that they worked. Unless you are lying to yourself.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Uhhuh. The results are always going to look good if you lie to yourself, as you are doing

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Lol, If you insist on lying after being called out, carry on.

  • B : Most of them didn’t work the first time,
  • L : So some worked. The rest took more time.
  • B : Well they haven't worked yet.
  • L : So you were lying to yourself? (since some worked)
  • B : Result look good when you lie to yourself.
  • L : Carry on lying to yourself then.
  • B : No, u!
  • B : No, u.
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn, you're really bringing out the "no, u!"

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Lying to yourself and now talking about yourself again. Carry on and reply with "no, u" to prove my point.