this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

College Football

953 readers
7 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Indiana Indiana
2. Ohio State Ohio State
3. Texas A&M Texas A&M
4. Alabama Alabama
~~5. BYU~~ BYU
6. Ole Miss Mississippi
7. Georgia Georgia
8. Texas Tech Texas Tech
~~9. Virginia~~ Virginia
T-10. Oregon Oregon
T-10. Texas Texas
~~T-12. Memphis~~ Memphis
T-12. Oklahoma Oklahoma
14. Utah Utah
T-15. Georgia Tech Georgia Tech
T-15. Vanderbilt Vanderbilt
T-15. North Texas North Texas
~~T-18. Louisville~~ Louisville
T-18. South Florida South Florida
20. Notre Dame Notre Dame
21. USC USC
22. Michigan Michigan
23. Miami Miami
T-24. Tennessee Tennessee
~~T-24. San Diego State~~ San  Diego State

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Stanford and Cal are expected to take reduced television revenue shares, while SMU will earn no television revenue from the league for approximately nine years.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] wjrii@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are a few EXTREMELY rich families of donors, including the Hunt family that owns the Chiefs and FC Dallas, who have just promised to float the program and fund NIL at competitive levels, but I do not envy their athletic department staff. They're going to be begging, borrowing, and stealing for the better part of a decade to keep up appearances, and if the football team doesn't make some noise, the culture could get pretty toxic in University Park. They also have 30+ years of alumni who picked SMU despite sports not mattering and 30+ years of locals who found something else to care about.

TCU is constantly on a razor's edge for general interest, even with 20 years of being an excellent G5 and respectable P5 program. It's just such a crowded market. Winning will fix a lot of things, but winning at any sustained or impressive level been the missing part of the SMU equation so far.

impressive level

They have recently done this. They were ranked as high as 15 in November a few years ago. They clearly showed potential (albeit for one year). Did it come crashing down? Yes, of course. But hey, they had those clean Dallas tribute unis and that makes up for it, right?

That was just before NIL. Now that programs can openly flaunt cash, who's going to stop them from returning to their Pony Excess ways?