50
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
50 points (100.0% liked)
Science
13006 readers
8 users here now
Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"non-human animals" - very strange wording
Pretty normal wording in scientific papers relating to animals, particularly in studies relating to traits humans share with other animals, like cooperation. It relates to the fact that humans are animals: the difference between humans and other animals is a matter of degrees of capability, rather than a binary presence or absence of a trait.
It's pretty much standard in research and biology in general. In common parlance we implicitly add "non-human" when talking about animals, but when biology is the object of study it's better to just be explicit.
Of course, humans are animals, and more specifically mammals and primates. Hopefully nobody is trying to argue we're plants or fungi.
It's just accurate?
How so?
Humans are animals. "Non-human animals" is the most direct and accurate way to specify the set of all animals that aren't humans.
What about it do you consider strange?
Seems to be technically correct.