301
Tesla is reportedly under investigation by the DOJ and SEC over it's mysterious 'Project 42'
(www.businessinsider.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
301 points (94.1% liked)
Technology
59081 readers
3009 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I don't know, but my best guess would be either it's a publicly traded company and needs to disclose how it spends its money, or that taxes weren't paid for the personal use funds
Got it in two. Both, per the article:
Elon doesn't own all of Tesla. It's a publicly traded company whose shares are held by millions(?) of people. The board and CEO are generally required to act in those owners' best interests, not their own. They have leeway, but building the CEO a house is a lot closer to embezzlement (taking company funds for personal gain) than say a PR stunt. Board/CEO remuneration is fairly carefully controlled to avoid this kind of thing.
As for tax, it looks like the US is a bit more lax with fringe benefit tax than other jurisdictions, but it could nonetheless apply.
So if he were to give himself a bonus and use that money to build the house would it still be illegal? Genuinely asking
No CEO of a public company has the power to just "give himself a bonus" if the sum is to be any more than pocket money. The board has to approve it.
The board would need to approve of that bonus, and in turn the board is accountable to shareholders. If a CEO starts using a public company as a personal piggy bank, shareholders have grounds to sue.
Well the shareholders have a right to question company being spent on side projects that do not work to increase the value for shareholders.
Sadly you can get away with a lot as a business just don’t piss off your share holders.
So you didn’t read it