this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
718 points (95.0% liked)

Funny

9340 readers
680 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't know how well this holds up, given that processed food is MADE from unprocessed food.

And we've progressed enough that we can tell if something is safe to eat without paying someone to eat it and watching if they get sick...

Not here for an argument, your comment is just genuinely confusing

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

Much like the image, my comment is a joke, so I'd be genuinely worried if it held up particularly well.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All I got from that comment is "food is immoral." Guess I'll starve?

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

Nono, not acknowledging the sacrifices of the first people to forage a wild hot pocket and try it, blind to the knowledge of if it was edible or thermally safe is immoral.

When you eat a bowl of berries you're relying on the sacrifices of unpaid and forgotten people who tried them first and didn't die.
When you eat a heaping bowl of pop tarts ™ you're relying on the sacrifices of paid and forgotten people who tried them first and didn't die in legally actionable numbers.

The key to solving the immorality of exploiting these people is money, because money solves morality.