287
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Houston lawsuit seeks to halt looming "Death Star" bill

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I just left two massive comments over on that thread explaining why the Florida law is problematic despite parts of it sounding common sensical.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I've been online way too much over the past couple days, and I haven't even come across any posts about that. Was that here on the fediverse? If so, apparently I need to find some more communities.

[-] HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using an URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !politics@lemmy.world

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
[-] HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Quickly adding that !politics is a different place than /m/politics, which is on kbin.social. /m/politics is not very active, and I recently created a post to generate interest in finding moderators because there are 2 major alt-right assholes over there who are posting frequently and are like 30% of all the threads created there.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The funny thing is that alt-right assholes is virulently anti-Trump and pro-DeSantis. It's hilarious seeing them tie themselves up in knots trying to justify why Trump's flavour of alt-right bullshit is bad but DeSantis' nearly identical flavour is good.

[-] HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know if you saw my comments on one of their posts yesterday, but I refuse to be drawn into a conversation with him. I'm glad there are others in the community already trying to combat the bigotry, but I'm sad their wasting their time on it at all. He is obviously not trying to persuade anyone there, so debating him is not possible.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I actually stopped following the kbin.social politics magazine a few days ago since I noticed the one here got more traffic. I just remember that guy posting a bunch of DeSantis spam before I left and assumed that he was still at it.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I could probably manage to be a temporary moderator with how much I'm online lately. I certainly like to report alt right assholes, so blocking them or removing their content isn't far off.

Don't know that I can say I can do it long-term, however. Especially if it becomes very big.

Edit: I myself am on kbin.social, but I subscribe to duplicate magazines/communities on other instances.

[-] HandsHurtLoL@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm realizing that I myself am probably going to end up being a moderator ... Ugh

I used to mod on reddit back in like 2012 and I knew how much time it took and I got way too consumed with it, but I think the priority isn't that moderators are vigilant 24 hours a day, but that users who harm the community are actively removed within a reasonable amount of time. Also the sub I used to mod went from like 6k to 10k users while I was there. There are maybe 25 people max on !politics 🤣🤣

Go leave a comment on the thread and I'll sort of wrap it up tonight with a proposal for 3 of us to approach Ernest about adding us as mods.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I've been a moderator on small subs. I am not able to commit to something very large, but I'm happy to help out and am online frequently.

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using an URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: !politics@lemmy.world

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
287 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19090 readers
2060 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS