this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
712 points (97.6% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

4381 readers
1393 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

If you had two very close candidates, and one sent you a followup email making their case specific to the job, that wouldn't sway you?

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 10 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Depends. Are you hiring people to send thank you emails?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No, because the time to make a case specific to the job is during the interview. Also, interviewees rarely have my email address. I wouldn't assume they all do.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Thank you emails on their own are kind of pointless, but it's a crucial tool for applicant to address anything that they realize might have been missed or to clarify something they thought was important.

It's a perfect opportunity to offer thanks and further your case for the position, but it should be relevant to the interview.

[–] itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Industry dependent I know but every time I've had two good candidates I've just gone ahead and hired both

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago

That's definitely not a common thing, unless you're fielding a new team or division. There is a limit though, yeah? So it could be a deciding factor even when hiring multiple positions from the same pool of candidates.

Every thank you letter I've sent wasn't a thank you letter at all. I call back to specific things the interviewer said during our interview, and make it one last opportunity to pitch myself as the best candidate.