this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
964 points (97.9% liked)

Facepalm

3095 readers
1181 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Irelephant@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Thats socialism, which is meant to lead eventually to communism. The end goal is to have no state.

If my understanding is correct, that is.

[โ€“] Zorque@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To be fair ๐Ÿค“ since it's mostly theoretical, any definition of communism is going to be in flux as it has not achieved a shelf-stable real life application yet.

It's shelf stable in the same way as a clay pigeon.

[โ€“] ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yeah, Lenin even stated this was the end-goal.

[โ€“] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think it's possible for a state to give up power.

it's one of those things a lot of thought's been put into and commies themselves argue about. i feel it's great to conceptualize (and with it the differing definitions of "the state" as well) but i'm not a scholar anyway, this ain't the place, and it's moot since socialism needs to be achieved first anyway, after we beat this whole fascism thing. no point in worrying to much about it eh?