this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
60 points (95.5% liked)

Gaming

3219 readers
190 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Every elder scrolls after daggerfall has been a step backwards.

[–] Montagge@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Daggerfall? More like Walkingfortoolongfall

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I always felt like Oblivion hit the sweet spot between accessibility and depth. It just lacks unique content.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t know if I’d say Daggerfall to Morrowind was a step backwards. In terms of years they’re not all that far apart. But in terms of capturing the philosophy of their respective eras? I’d call them two different types of maximalism, before things coalesced into the distilled Skyrim experience.

Both of those games were before my time, but the impression I get with Daggerfall is that this was right when PCs started getting enough memory to go crazy and build giant procedurally generated worlds. Morrowind is like that with maximizing graphics and sounds, it’s in that first generation of games that aged differently to everything that came before. As dated as Morrowind looks, it still looks really high effort and (dare I say it) artfully designed. It’s much more of a game, while DF feels to me like a game program. Am I making any sense?