this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
165 points (93.2% liked)
Open Source
36150 readers
140 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I like paid cloud or sync features for apps that you can do it yourself as well. Like Zotero or some writing apps
Cloud services or features monetization are interesting, I've seen some companies do a community or a local version and the business version with more features.
The slippery slope that projects taking this approach fall into boils down to 'let's put all our new features behind a business version and never add them to the community version until they become 2 totally different code bases'
What about a modular software, a base version and the modules are paid ? It would maybe avoid ramification? And the user would have more freedom.
What other examples? :)
I always imagined some sort of IP royalty, like you have an idea and implement it, then if someone build something over it for profit they need to pay a fixed percentage otherwise it would be free to use basically.
Sounds a bit like Rustdesk. I'm happily hosting a relay on my VPS but the 'account' features don't work for the free version. I just keep them in a note instead.