157
submitted 1 year ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

No, this is revisionist history. The 90s were part of a nearly 15 year period when house prices were flat in Canada. For quite a few years your return would have been negative. People in the 90s were not thinking of their house as their retirement account.

We did stop making enough housing, but it’s precisely that artificial scarcity that is making people treat it as an “investment”. If we make enough, it will not be treated primarily as an investment anymore, which is how it should be.

[-] FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

The 90s followed the extremely high interest rates, which were why housing was flat. People couldn't easily buy in, so demand was reduced.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

But that just further corroborates the point: when housing was at its most affordable it was not considered a good investment.

It’s also important to note that housing remained flat even when interest rates went down, partially because of a healthy stock of non-market and market housing.

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
157 points (96.4% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
456 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS