this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
-20 points (4.5% liked)

Conservative

78 readers
11 users here now

A community for some conservative points of view.

🍃🌻 Rule 1: Kindly be empathetic and kind to others. Trolling and spamming will not be tolerated. Making the community a friendly & supportive place is our goal.

All of us are here for a short lifetime. Let’s have a nice time here and avoid negativity. :)

Please be respectful, even if you don't agree.

Don't personally attack people. Don't call them names.

Be grown-ups.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Fair point. Let's take a slightly deeper look. The annual interest on the US national debt is approaching $1 TRILLION. Any number starting with "M" amounts less than a tenth of one percent of that. So it won't "pay down" anything, it will just add a tiny drop in the bucket to one year's interest. I haven't done any math to estimate the problems resulting from putting a shitload more guns into circulation, but my guess it they would cost more than the benefits. But that's like, just my opinion, man.

[–] WilliamFBuckley@lemy.lol -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So it won’t “pay down” anything, it will just add a tiny drop in the bucket to one year’s interest.

Agreed. But just like paying off personal debt, "any" is more than "none," so I have no problems with it.

I do have problems with both parties wasting money and getting us into debt in the first place, though.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Like I said tho - cost/benefit analysis. Introducing what I assume is a huge number of confiscated guns into the population will create costs downstream, not just moar freedom.