this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
669 points (95.8% liked)

People Twitter

6621 readers
1221 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AntelopeRoom@lemm.ee 41 points 6 days ago (2 children)

ACA sucks, but okay. ACA was a compromise. Not an example of inspiring change.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 14 points 6 days ago

Yeah, Democrats compromising with Democrats.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (4 children)

change happens in many small steps

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

This sold under the same banner as "any lasting change is non-violent."

incrementalism is just another way to argue for mass passivity.

That's how we've gotten here.

The ACA further enshrined the core rot of our healthcare system into it, FOR PROFIT health insurers.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

this makes a lot of assumptions about the intent of my message.

I don't believe in passivity, I believe direct action and violence are a necessary part of defending democracy.

However I also recognize if we expect every change to be immediate and sweeping we may neglect to continue building on that change as we have often done.

As for the ACA, no arguments here it was a smoldering pile of shit replacing a slightly larger, smoldering pile of shit.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It didn't really replace anything. It was an attempt to build a useful and beneficial system that would support generations moving forward into the future.

But instead it was mashed to support the current generation by keeping a beneficial and useful healthcare system in the future.

People had voted for and candidates had run on healthcare reform and the head of the DNC was adamant about the Public Option as a minimum. Obama fired him once he was elected.

It wasn't the people being demanding and impatient. It was the panicking oligarchy buying the government back from enacting the will of the people.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

who was the person Obama removed? that's wild

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Howard Dean. The other guy from Vermont.

He was replaced with Tim Kaine.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

thanks! always interesting to read about stuff i didn't know

[–] prex@aussie.zone 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You included a picture of incremental change.
I'm not from US & can't really comment on your best options now. Where I am is OK at the moment due to incremental steps, some forward & some backward.
I understand its different for you guys. I can only hope you survive the next few years & recover. I'm sure locals there will have better/more specific advice.

Edit: *You

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Have you been in a coma for the past couple months?

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

true, i should have said positive change, very easy to make things worse

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

If you wait for the perfect solution, you likely will never get it. Similar to pedestrian friendly infrastructure and people’s expectations on day 1.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What did we actually get since ACA?

Asking for a friend

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

slightly less terrible care for millions of Americans