this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
11 points (86.7% liked)

AskUSA

1248 readers
1 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

  1. !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
  2. !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

  1. Be nice or gtfo
  2. Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
  3. Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

  1. !askuk@feddit.uk
  2. !casualuk@feddit.uk
  3. !casualconversation@lemm.ee
  4. !yurop@lemm.ee
  5. !esp@lemm.ee

Related communities

  1. !asklemmy@lemmy.world
  2. !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
  3. !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
  4. !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
  5. !uspolitics@lemmy.world
  6. !politics@piefed.social

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
OpenStars@discuss.online
m_f@midwest.social
m_f@discuss.online
Anticorp@lemmy.world
11
What do you think of the ruling today that AI art can't be copyrighted? (www.reuters.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by m_f@discuss.online to c/AskUSA@discuss.online
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

HN thread

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] m_f@discuss.online 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I view it as generally a good thing. I see copyright as an unnatural restriction on our rights. An explosion of AI art that can't be copyrighted means the default assumption will be that all art you see is libre. Approximately nobody will care about copyright in a few decades at most, and it will be de facto dead.

(Edited to move this to be a comment for easier discussion)