this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
442 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

14760 readers
3356 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

I was very skeptical about this story playing out as told. When looking for a more complete article, this exact story is published from 2019 from multiple sources.

While I don't think it is a requirement all guns sold in the US need to pass the SAAMI Drop Test, I can't imagine anything being sold that wouldn't pass it, especially a revolver where the design likely hasn't changed in 100 years. The drop test covers drops at various angles from 4 feet high, higher than a person sitting and taking off a shoe. Revolvers also need to have the hammer pulled back before firing or have extremely long and heavy trigger pulls.

I'm calling both fake news and if this story did happen, I can't see it being anything but a negligent discharge from someone assuming it wasn't loaded or just being a fool putting a finger where it didn't belong.

[–] angband@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://www.sportsmansguide.com/customerservice/productsafetyrecalls

two handguns on that list in the past two years, one in 2023 which can discharge if dropped. the other if decocked. the world is full of poorly designed machines.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The Ruger was a bit of a surprise. The Taurus was not. They have a pretty bad history for this. Both are striker fired semi autos, which are more mechanically complex than a revolver. The only revolver recall I saw this millennium was for a Rossi, which is also owned by Taurus. If there wasn't a plant in Georgia, I'd think they'd have been banned from import by now from the massive PT series recall.

Also "article of clothing" isn't the best holster option, and likely increases the odds of injuring one's self much more than even the worst pistol to make it out the factory door.

I could be wrong of course, but if I had to put money on either him shooting himself and making a corny excuse vs even the cheapest gun on the market going off from a 2 foot fall, I'd feel very confident putting my money on his index finger. The gun in a shoe and then forgetting about the gun in the shoe don't paint this guy as the safest character.

load more comments (13 replies)