this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
29 points (71.0% liked)

Buy Canadian

1374 readers
751 users here now

A community dedicated to buying Canadian products.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love creators hosting their content on more disparate platforms, I would love to see less centralization. But the problem is that these all cost so much. YouTube Premium is $13/month and I get access to a huge variety of channels. LTT on Floatplane is $5/month for one collection of channels (which are available on YouTube, maybe with some bits cut). Corridor Digital is similar at $4/month.

Very few channels actually provide me $5/month worth of value. This is only really reasonable for the biggest fans (which admittedly I am not of either of these). Even if these channels have a few videos a week (maybe LTT is over daily with all of their different programs) that is a lot to pay for little variety.

I understand the problem here. Only a tiny number of users are actually going to sign up anyways, so you need to extract more value from them. Say LTT makes $0.50/month from the average subscriber on YouTube. If they charged $0.50/month for their Floatplane channel they would actually loose money, because the people that sign up on Floatplane are going to be above average subscribers. So they need to charge more to even break even (let's say they value control enough that they aren't looking for increased revenue). But as they raise the price along the curve they are even more heavily filtering for the biggest fans, which were bringing them in top percentile revenue on YouTube, making the problem even worse. This means that these platforms are always going to be priced to profit off the whales, rather than the casual users who enjoy watching some videos from these channels. Maybe in some beautiful feature where publishing on separate platforms becomes normalized this will change, but it is very far in the future and a huge roadblock to getting to that future.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

YouTube Premium is $13/month and I get access to a huge variety of channels.

Here's the thing... if you divided up that $13 among all the channels you watch, and gave the creator that amount, they'd be making more than the money that comes to them from YouTube.

As an extreme example, let's say you benefit from 50 unique channels per month. That's around $0.26 each channel ($13 / 50), which is MORE than what YouTube would pay them for your views.

If you only watch 10 channels on a regular basis, that's $1.30 per channel, per month - way, wayyy more than what youtube pays out for a single user per month.

With enough paying simply paying creators pennies per month, they'd make more than enough money to cut out ads, sponsors, and other unsavoury forms of monetization.

Louis Rossman has talked about this a few times, but as someone who has a YouTube channel, I can confirm this to be true.

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

But that's my point. If these creators on different sites charged between $0.26 and $1.30 I would have subscribed to a bunch of them. But when they are charging $5/month that is quite a different amount to pay. Something that I would only really be considering for my absolute favourites.