this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
784 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

63746 readers
3616 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
784
Judges Are Fed up With Lawyers Using AI That Hallucinate Court Cases (www.404media.co)
submitted 23 hours ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
117 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

But the explanation and Ramirez’s promise to educate himself on the use of AI wasn’t enough, and the judge chided him for not doing his research before filing. “It is abundantly clear that Mr. Ramirez did not make the requisite reasonable inquiry into the law. Had he expended even minimal effort to do so, he would have discovered that the AI-generated cases do not exist. That the AI-generated excerpts appeared valid to Mr. Ramirez does not relieve him of his duty to conduct a reasonable inquiry,” Judge Dinsmore continued, before recommending that Ramirez be sanctioned for $15,000.

Falling victim to this a year or more after the first guy made headlines for the same is just stupidity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

not really no. They are statistical models that use heuristics to output what is most likely to follow the input you give it

They are in essence mimicking their training data

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So I think this whole thing about whether it can lie or not is just semantics then no?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

everything is semantics.

Lying is telling a falsehood intentionally

LLM's clearly lack the prerequisite intentionality

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

They can’t have intent, no?

The llm is incapable of having intent because it’s just programming

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 6 points 13 hours ago

precisely, which is why they cannot lie, just respond with no real grasp of wether what they output is truth or falsehoods.