this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
959 points (93.3% liked)

Comic Strips

14235 readers
3060 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/26512687

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There were no corporations in the ussr. There were business, not multi regional conglomerates.

And even then the purpose of a corporation is to profit. That is it's sole goal.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn't change that the powers of governance and commerce were in the same hands. Changing what you call it is just semantics.

[–] yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Intent is incredibly important. In all systems trade happens. The idea that capitalism=markets is incredibly stupid, equally stupid is the idea that all work is done under a corporation for the sole purpose of making someone else rich, as you have suggested here.

The problem is not that things are done for the sake of the state or not, but what purpose things are done for. In fascism the state is owned by corporate interests, the leading interest being whatever dictator sits at the top. Work is done solely to make those corporate owners privately rich, nothing more. Each system is built openly for class oppression.

Even in the most brain rotted American views the ussr is nothing like that. You'd have to be a fascist or brain damaged to even try to argue it.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago

the leading interest being whatever dictator sits at the top.

This is the part that matters. This is also true for Soviet communism or really any real life communism. The instruments are different, but the song is the same.