Selfhosted

61129 readers

504 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

Docker in LXC vs VM (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by mr_jaaay@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

55 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I run a small server with Proxmox, and I'm wondering what are your opinions on running Docker in separate LXC containers vs. running a specific VM for all Docker containers?

I started with LXC containers because I was more familiar with installing services the classic Linux way. I later added a VM specifically for running Docker containers. I'm thinking if I should continue this strategy and just add some more resources to the docker VM.

On one hand, backups seem to be easier with individual LXCs (I've had situations where I tried to update a Docker container but the new container broke the existing configuration and found it easiest just to restore the entire VM from backup). On the otherhand, it seems like more overhead to install Docker in each individual LXC.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't use proxmox, so I guess I don't understand the appeal. I don't see any reason to backup a container or a VM, I just backup configs and data. Backing up a VM makes sense if you have a bunch of customizations, but that's pretty much the entire point of docker, you quarantine your customizations to your configs so it's completely reproducible if you have the configs and data.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ease of use mostly, one click to restore everything including the OS is nice. Can also easily move them to other hosts for HA or maintenance.

Not everything runs in docker too, so it's extra useful for those VMs.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That's fair.

That said, I can't think of anything I'd want to run that doesn't work in docker, except maybe pf? But I'd probably put that on a dedicated machine anyway. Pretty much everything else runs on Linux or has a completely viable Linux alternative, so I could easily built a docker image for it.