this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
21 points (86.2% liked)

Cryptography @ Infosec.pub

380 readers
57 users here now

Questions, answers, discussions, and literature on the theory and practice of cryptography

Rules (longer version here)

##Related resources;

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] nesc@lemmy.cafe -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

That wasn't flame, I have a dubious honor of supporting wireguard based vpn service. What part of my claims is false? There is no general purpose vpn suite based on wireguard (I'm talking openvpn style, not just pseudo lan that can't even tell if the other end is alive), wg included with kernel is extremely limited and pretty much worthless for anything but p2p connections, and as much as I hate ike I would prefer to use it instead. As for me not replying to the author, I have seen his posts before, he is not a pleasant person to speak to.

Edit: After re-reading my first post it might look as a personal attack, that wasn't my intention at all, just this post came after I've finished trying to debug another wireguard problem in our app. ๐Ÿซ 

[โ€“] Natanael@infosec.pub 4 points 3 days ago

The list of management tools available for it isn't exactly short. Others mentioned specific tools too.

https://github.com/cedrickchee/awesome-wireguard

Before you vent by attacking it and attacking everybody recommending it, how about explaining your problems and what you've already tried?