this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
35 points (76.9% liked)

AskUSA

382 readers
1 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

  1. !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
  2. !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

  1. Be nice or gtfo
  2. Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
  3. Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

  1. !askuk@feddit.uk
  2. !casualuk@feddit.uk
  3. !casualconversation@lemm.ee
  4. !yurop@lemm.ee
  5. !esp@lemm.ee

Related communities

  1. !asklemmy@lemmy.world
  2. !asklemmy@sh.itjust.works
  3. !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
  4. !showerthoughts@lemmy.world
  5. !usa@ponder.cat

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://gregtech.eu/post/7570120

Title. It seems like the police just chose a random person to have someone to prosecute.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meh. A bad dude died. The bad dude's actions resulted on the order of at least >1 death/ day. If not for their death, we couldn't be having this broader conversation on what we can do to "solve" the billionaire problem. Even if it involves the sacrifice of one innocent person, its probably all been worth it, and will continue to be if the pattern continues.

losing two peoples < losing many people + starting a broader movement

Its a net gain regardless.

[โ€“] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago

A better argument would be Blue Cross Blue Shield immediately changing a controversial policy afterwards.