this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
617 points (98.7% liked)

DeclineIntoCensorship

72 readers
1311 users here now

founded 1 day ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ech@lemm.ee 0 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

I'm not saying this couldn't happen, but this justdoesn't ring super true to me. How would the user know who the "identified individual" was, how they found the husband's information, or who they called (the "friend") at his company that's apparently in control of his employment? That's a lot of convenient coincidences that, even of they are true, would hardly be easily accessible information to make such a confident accusation.

[–] lonerangers1@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

truepeoplesearch.com

give it a go. Try searching your name, number, address and see what you get.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

It doesn't ring true because of the vagueness of the post.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 14 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If the employer is an University or something like that in a smaller state, and they called specifically about a policy change or something happening at the department of education, it could be relatively easy to happen, especially if they gave their name when calling the representative (which I guess you would).