this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
1006 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

62063 readers
4897 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 191 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Jeep is a Stellantis product. Literally the worst quality auto manufacturer in North America. They are circling the drain and jacking up the prices on their vehicles and making Pikachu faces when they don't sell. Their only customers are people who don't know how to research their purchases, and putting advertisement hell into their cars is another example of that. I suspect they will not be in business a decade from now.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 61 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I work in the auto industry. Can confirm, Stellantis is in bad shape. I wouldn't buy anything from them.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 27 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

What's confusing is that some great auto brands from Europe are under Stellantis (Peugeot and Citroen at least)

And they're actually not doing a shitty job in designing or selling their vehicles. It's mainly the Chrysler brands or basically the US brands under Stellantis. I seriously hope the shit happening in Chrysler doesn't come trickling down to the other brands

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 38 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Turns out regulations are good for businesses.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 25 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Regulations are definitely excellent for both businesses and consumers in the long term. But businesses are often too stupid to see past ANYTHING "quarterly".

[–] Vinstaal0@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

That depends on the business culture and how good their advisors are. And also the size if the business matter.

But yeah generally angelosaxton companies who have a mangement structure that’s way more in depth than it needs to be fuck these things over

[–] mPony@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

"Either the Line Goes Up or the Rope Goes Up" - evil CEOs everywhere

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

They're good for longevity, but they're bad for quarterly profits. In the US, we care much more for the latter.

[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 16 hours ago

Peugeot and Citroën have their own issues in Europe (and technically in America) with the recall of car due to defective airbags.

[–] lenz@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, who would you buy from?

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Out of the American big three, I have the most confidence in Ford. I've worked with engineers at all three, and the ones at Ford are the ones that I felt were most compitent.

That being said, my next car will probably be a Toyota or a Subaru. Both way better than the American OEMs.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 38 points 1 day ago

Jeep Renegade is a rebadged Fiat 500L.

[–] Bell@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

It'll be less than a decade

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 4 points 22 hours ago

I had two Jeeps, first was originally my dad's. It was an old shitbox. The other one was a somewhat old shitbox. 1998 & 2010. We dumped more time and money into them than I'd care to admit.