this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
318 points (93.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

30764 readers
494 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Venicon@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I may be wrong but I believe Nikola Tesla was financed by wealthy New Yorkers after his separation from asshole Edison but they pulled the plug when they realised he was going to give away free power to people.

May be apocryphal but I think there was someone who invented a car that ran on water but big oil stepped in.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The water car is one of those great conspiracy theories that carries just enough weight to sound plausible.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

... Carries just enough water to sound plausible.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 26 points 1 day ago

It's not even close to plausible. It gets legs because it is appealing to think "they" are just that evil and that all our problems can be easily solved once "they" are out of power.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think there are other conspiracies within the automotive industry that are true, i.e. could have done better for fuel economy but would have impacted profits. The water car is not one of them. There are applications that use water to change engine dynamics that are viable (my dad had a patent on one and lived his life battling people who didn't want to hear about it), but running on water is too far from reality.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

I think it was actually hydrogen electric and allegedly there was some special catalyst that made it thermodynamically plausible.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the water car is fake, but they had viable electric cars in the 90s.

and for a brief period in the early 1900s.

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How would you run a car on water? Water is spent fuel.

[–] Tehdastehdas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you're in a dry, hot environment and evaporate water in a swamp cooler, you lose about 2.3MJ/l (0.6kWh/l), from which you can skim maybe ~10% (0.06kWh/l) with a thermocouple. If you're charging a Dacia Spring consuming 156Wh/km, you'd have to evaporate ~300 liters of water to drive 100km. (Edit: some errors.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy_of_vaporization#Other_common_substances
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_generator#Efficiency
https://ev-database.org/cheatsheet/energy-consumption-electric-car

But then, what if you bought solar panels and a wind turbine instead of thermocouples and water?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works -1 points 21 hours ago

The state of science education is so disheartening.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

The Why Files has a good video on the mysterious deaths around "free" energy technology.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How was Tesla going to generate free power? Bend the laws of physics?

[–] egerlach@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

Didn't have to be real, just scary to the powerful.

(Not commenting on truth of whether it happened or not, just a generalization of my observations of the behaviours of the powerful)

[–] Xuderis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

He believed that the Earth had “fluid electrical charges” running beneath its surface, that when interrupted by a series of electrical discharges at repeated set intervals, would generate a limitless power supply by generating immense low-frequency electrical waves.

https://thefifthestate.com.au/energy-lead/energy/nikola-tesla-dreamed-of-free-electricity-what-happened/

In recent experiments I have discovered two novel facts of importance in this connection. One of these facts is that an electric current is generated in a wire extending from the ground to a great height by the axial and probably also by the translatory, movement of the earth. No appreciable current, however, will flow continuously in the wire unless the electricity is allowed to leak out into the air. Its escape is greatly facilitated by providing at the elevated end of the wire a conducting terminal of great surface, with many sharp edges or points. We are thus enabled to get a continuous supply of electrical energy by merely supporting a wire at a great height, but, unfortunately, the amount of electricity which can be so obtained is small.

https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/articles/nikola-teslas-free-energy-documents

[–] Venicon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I read a variation of this years ago though the author of the one I read may have embellished it somewhat.

‘Yes, Nikola Tesla demonstrated wireless power transmission, but not quite in the way people often imagine.

In 1899, during his experiments in Colorado Springs, Tesla managed to wirelessly light incandescent lamps over a short distance (about 25 miles is sometimes claimed) using resonant inductive coupling. He used a large Tesla coil to create high-voltage electrical fields, which could transfer energy through the air. Some reports suggest that he successfully powered a bank of light bulbs several miles away, though there is no definitive proof.

Tesla’s ultimate vision was Wardenclyffe Tower, a massive structure designed to transmit electricity wirelessly across vast distances. However, the project was never completed due to financial issues and skepticism from investors like J.P. Morgan.

So while Tesla did achieve wireless power transfer over short distances, the idea of lighting bulbs miles away in a practical, controlled manner remains largely theoretical.’