this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
610 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

11318 readers
1390 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _thebrain_@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Probably not. Sooner rather than later most free press will be shut down by trump and the only news that anyone will get is whatever there government wants you to hear. Stories like this will disappear.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

That's already the case.

Do you remember every single mainstream outlet falling in line to promote the Iraq war? To blackout the antiwar protests? Going to Occupy Wallstreet and interviewing random weirdos instead of the organizer's designated press people? The coverage of Ukraine? The coverage of Israel?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think you vastly overestimate how organized the Trump admin is. I'm sure they will try, though.

[–] mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

It’ll only get more competent and organized as time goes on.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Nah the free press like the billionaires and everyone else who wants to stay in business will lick Trump's balls.

[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't you think that's a bit of a hysterical take?

Stories like this one, someone noticing that a website has been taken down, will disappear??

It's hardly the peak of investigative journalism or a complicated story requiring hundreds of hours of work by a trained journalist.

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, I mean hysterical as in overly exaggerated due to high emotion.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, you're just wrong on that front given the examples shown

[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The examples given are about Trump limiting access for news agencies to the government, and trying to bully big news orgs. How would those things prevent someone writing a story about a public website disappearing?

Don't get me wrong, what he's doing is bad for press freedom and will have a chilling effect on the more complicated stories that need more journalistic input and explanation to gain traction and public understanding, but as I said "this kind of story" isn't exactly complicated and saying "stories like this will disappear" is just not realistic.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You seriously wrote that first paragraph and can't see what the other person is saying?

[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I think it's hyperbolic, that's the whole point of my first comment

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure by "stories like this" they're referring to ones that highlight the activities of the Trump administration, not literally stories about websites going down (if that's a mischaracterization of what you're saying, I apologize, but I'm not sure what your meaning was if not that)

[–] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You got my meaning, and yes maybe that is what the OC meant.

I think we've got to be a bit careful and keep our powder dry sometimes with trump stuff. Pretty much everything he does is bad and shocking, but if we overreact or exaggerate it makes people less likely to listen when it's a really bad thing that might actually cur through. I'm pretty sure the reason he has got away with a lot of stuff so far is that people have just tuned out the constant noise.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

And that's exactly the goal: bury us in so much bullshit we don't know which end is up and no matter what we react to it'll be the wrong thing, and hope that we all give up and give in to feeling helpless

[–] _thebrain_@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Have you watched the news in the US in the time period since the original post? Has any news media even mentioned this? A post on mastodon is great. I would venture that 99% of the population from the US doesn't use Mastodon, tho I don't really know for sure the numbers . Of the percentage that do, how many are going to see this person's post?