this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
-28 points (15.0% liked)

Conservative

462 readers
150 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What penalties would have been proscribed had a vindictive man not been returned to power vs when he can unleash hell upon a judge? It's a fun thought experiment.

[–] jimbolauski@lemm.ee 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

A former New York Attorney General, and rabid Trump hater, says he shouldn't have been charged, the judge doesn't sentence him and the conclusion you draw is the judge was intimidated.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jimbolauski@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

Since you seemed to miss it the first time.

https://lemm.ee/post/53270418/17727028

Let's see if you can provide a source that the judge was intimidated by Trump.