this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
14 points (85.0% liked)

Politics

1094 readers
314 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Barely won? He won essentially every state that wasn't deep blue. They each may have been small margins individually, but that's a pretty massive overall victory. Pretending it wasn't decisive isn't helping anyone, it's just denial.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And, if you add up all the counties of the United States and give one vote for each county, he won a massive victory, like those entirely-red maps that right wingers like to post that ignore population. The point is, though, that's not an accurate way to count who is popular and not.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

He won the popular vote too though. That was supposedly impossible for Republicans in the modern era.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It may not be an accurate way to count, but it IS the way this country counts elections. By the rules of the game, we lost; in a big way.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 7 points 1 year ago

And then I say, "Yes, but that's not an accurate way to count who's popular." And then you say, "Yes, but it is our current system, and determines who won the election." And then I say, "But that's not the point, if you read the article, it's talking about popularity specifically." And then you say, "But popularity doesn't define the results of the election, the real point is, by our current system, he won by a lot" And basically we can keep going like that forever.

Sounds like fun, right?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

A 1% swing from R to D and the reverse is true. Our system exaggerates close results as a bunch of battleground states move together. And even on the electoral front, this wasn't a big victory. Biden got 306 electoral votes in 2020, Trump got 312. In 2008, Obama won 365-173. That was a massive victory.