this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
270 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

74012 readers
3448 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 69 points 7 months ago (4 children)
[–] anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 11 points 7 months ago (4 children)

They still tie it to your ID since you need the phone number.

And we just trust them not to share your social map to NSA which they totally don't do. Trust me bro

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The NSA already has your social map from Apple, Google, Facebook/whatsapp, plus a hundred other sources you've given access to your contacts in the past decade.

Even if you've never used any of those, or given any app access to your contacts, 99% of your contacts have.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Data is about as good as it is current though and many people are reducing their exposure to these parasites

A person can now pretty easily go without logging into any of these apps with a few adjustments.

Hence why signal relationship maps will be even more valuable going forward. Hence my theory about signal...

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm not getting you.

There's correspondence, there's metadata, and there's phone-ID relationship.

Signal still protects #1 and #2 better than #3. And the way it works, infrastructure load is much bigger than for most other messaging platforms. So it makes total sense they limit registration somehow .

I'm not sure I remember by now what I've read about Signal protocol, but I think the fact of who messages whom they don't have, so it's not just trust.

~~Anyway, if you've read about 90s' mixmaster servers for mail, while Signal developers don't approve of alternative clients, there are libraries and it's possible to make some kind of a mixmaster bot. ~~

I've left this, because it's funny as a good illustration of why they don't want alternative clients, among other things - because I've described a voluntary MITM.

[–] anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That they do, but your contacts doesn't have to get it anymore.
A self-hosted matrix stack built from source with matrix clients built from source with e2ee implemented that you yourself have the competence to verify the encryption and safety of would be the only secure communication I know of if you don't want to trust a third party.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

I'm way more concerned about the privacy of what I say than who I say it to.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 0 points 7 months ago

Guess I better stick with Facebook messenger then.
/s Does that even exist still?

[–] explore_broaden@midwest.social 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They still don’t have backups on iOS which is a deal-breaker for me.

[–] toothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why would you use iOS if you care about privacy?

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why would you use iOS if you care about privacy?

Because it’s far better for privacy than any Google-Play-Services-ridden version of Android, and sometimes in life you don’t want to have to deal with custom ROMs anymore.

But also that’s an exceptionally dumb question, because the implication is that privacy can’t matter to people who don’t go to the same precise lengths someone else does.

[–] toothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, my problems with Apple go beyond just the privacy issues.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Fair enough, Apple has some pretty fucking terrible anti-consumer behavior. Privacy is just one of the few things they do well.

[–] Peasley@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I couldnt find a working Ubuntu touch app last i tried to use it

[–] michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ubuntu touch is dead. Are there at least native browsers for it?

[–] Peasley@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is it? I still get regular updates. Yes there are a few, i use Morph

https://www.ubuntu-touch.io/

[–] michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago

For some reason, I thought Ubuntu touch was EOL. Probably because I tried it on a Redmi 5 and it was an unofficial 2018 build. Is the Morph browser still supported? I checked the Github page and the last changes were 3 years ago.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee -3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

After Signal's lie about dropping SMS support because of "engineering costs", I really can't believe anything else they say.

Plus the app experience sucks, it's no better than SMS.

it’s no better than SMS

That's not true, but even so, the whole point is to be an alternative to SMS. It provides that experience, so I'm happy.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Wasn't another explanation people mistakenly sending SMS and getting fucked when they meant to send a Signal message?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

Are you talking about the signal from five years ago or something?